Talk:Rise Up, Shepherd, and Follow
Rise Up, Shepherd, and Follow was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 9, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Lyrics and sample
[edit]The song is quite old and I am sure there are public domain lyrics available somewhere. However, many of these old sources involve heavy and outdated dialect, so I don't think they are appropriate to feature in the article.
In addition, given the song's popularity, I feel like a public domain or other appropriately licensed performance must exist somewhere. Both lyrics and an audio sample would be nice additions to this article. Geethree (talk) 16:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Rise Up, Shepherd, and Follow/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TompaDompa (talk · contribs) 08:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
This is a WP:QUICKFAIL based on criterion 3 (It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include {{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags.
) and criterion 1 (It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
), specifically WP:GACR 2b (reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
). The current version has significant amounts of unsourced material. I'll add some maintenance tags to the article itself.