Talk:Rios (disambiguation)

Requested move 1 October 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per consensus. (non-admin closure) QEDK (愛 • 海) 08:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The request to rename this article to Rios (disambiguation) has been carried out.

Ríos (disambiguation) → Rios (disambiguation) – generalize to all forms, as not all contain the accent/diacritic -- 70.51.46.15 (talk) 06:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure that this is needed, the first item on the page Ríos is still with í, redirect will cover it. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@70.51.46.15 and In ictu oculi: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment while the first item indeed contains the accent, not all entries on the page do. So I would think that it would be better to contain this page at the simpler non-accented title. Additionally, the Portuguese form does not contain the accent, so the "original language" if construed to be Portuguese instead of Spanish, would not have an accent. The ancestral languages to Spanish and Portuguese do not use accents (ie. Latin, Vulgar Latin, Iberian Latin), so the accent is a rather more recent invention. -- 70.51.46.15 (talk) 08:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The page title should reflect the majority of the list entries. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 02:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others above and in the spirit of Wikipedia:Redirects from foreign languages. (And after the move, all the WP:PTMs that are for things not known as "Rios" alone should be moved to See also). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.