Talk:Rio Grande rift

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Rio Grande rift is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: New Mexico Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Mexico portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico.

Untitled

THIS IS ONE BEAUTIFULLY WRITTEN ARTICLE: THANK YOU Tdw1203 (talk) 23:41, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rio Grande rift. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051220215216/http://home.att.net/~sgeoveatch/rio_grande_rift.htm to http://home.att.net/~sgeoveatch/rio_grande_rift.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://igpphelp.ucsd.edu/~fialko/Assets/PDF/fialkoGRL01b.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

According to this style guide: https://rmag.memberclicks.net/assets/MountainGeologist/Author%20Style%20Guide_Download_2016.pdf. The term "Rio Grande Rift" is given as a specific example of a proper name that should be fully capitalized. If this is the case, should we not rename this article to reflect the correct capitalization style? Kent G. Budge (talk) 14:55, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's a "specialist" style guide. General publications usually do not cap it. Dicklyon (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Rio Grande Rift is a specialist concept. Kent G. Budge (talk) 01:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What does that even mean? Dicklyon (talk) 06:09, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

class activity

Each fact is referenced by a reliable source. I also do not think that this article is biased. It shares factual evidence with its readers rather than persuading them to pick a side or the author giving their opinion. --Brunobella (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Class Activity: Rio Grande Rift

Everything in the article is appropriately referenced down below in the references section. Nothing is out of place or stated without being correctly cited. The article is also very neutral and has no bias towards one side, given that it is only stating facts about the Rio Grande rift.Sndiego1501 (talk) 18:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Class activity

Each fact in this article is referenced with an appropriate and reliable reference. This is proven in the references section below the article. The article is neutral since it simply gives facts about the Rio Grande Rift without any contradictions and/or opinions. Hornets 2001 (talk) 18:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]