Talk:Riley's Lock/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 20:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

I peer reviewed this article some weeks ago and found nothing much to quibble about. I suppose in the interests of full disclosure I should add that to the best of my knowledge I am no connection with the Riley of Riley's Lock, and, that done, I am pleased to promote this article, which seems to me to meet all the GA criteria: Tim riley talk 20:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Well illustrated.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Well illustrated.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

@Tim riley: Thank you so much! TwoScars (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2021 (UTC)