Talk:Right to Censor

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	Right to Censor is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

RtC writer leaving WWE

According to Ivory, the writer responsible for the Right to Censor storyline had left the company.

This needs some more explanation, methinks. Jeff Silvers 18:57, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in agreement with that. Either it ends up looking like an unsubstantiated rumor, or at the very least, a comment with no explanation or proof. Plus, if there were more to the story, it would be worthy as trivia. But that statement on it's own, it isn't. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.242.41.219 (talk) 08:08, August 22, 2007 (UTC)