This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
"It was released on" → "The song was released on" but it is not written out in prose that the song was released under the labels
fixed
"as the third single from Killer Love, it was remixed to feature" → "as the third single, a remix was recorded featuring"
fixed
Remove duplicate usage of "Written by"
fixed
"Daniel Morris and co-written and" → "Daniel Morris, and co-written and"
fixed
""Right There" island-flavored midtempo" → "it is an island-flavored midtempo"
fixed
Remove the selection for release sentence since that is not notable here
fixed
""Right There" was intended to be" → "The song was originally intended to be" moving this to be the sentence before the writing/comp one
fixed
"urban production which stood out from the disco-tinged songs" → "urban production, which stood out from the mainstream songs" to be more consistent with the body
fixed
"for its playful nature" → "for the playful nature"
fixed
Remove the release year of "Rude Boy" since this is not notable for the lead
fixed
Remove the "Edge of Seventeen" comparison because that is only mentioned by one reviewer
fixed
"by calling the song a" → "by calling it a"
fixed
"In the UK, "Right There" debuted at number three, giving Scherzinger her third consecutive top three single" → "In the United Kingdom, the song debuted at number three, giving Scherzinger her fourth consecutive top-ten single" per what the body actually says
fixed
"It also peaked in the top-ten" → "Outside of the UK, the song peaked in the top-ten" per this being a new para
Remove the year-end charts, as these aren't notable here
fixed
Merge the fourth para with the third per overly short size
fixed
Merely cut the first music video sentence to stating it was directed by Paul Hunter, as nobody wants to read background info in the lead
fixed
""Right There" was the most watched video on YouTube on its day of" → "The visual was the most watched video on YouTube on the day of" removing the Billboard part, as it is not notable who reported that in the lead
fixed
"while MTV also gave the song a similar accolade on its website too." → "while it scored a similar accolade on MTV's website." with the wikilink
""Right There" is a" → "Musically, "Right There" is a" moving the genres to music and lyrics, though keep this sentencew ith the writing part only here
fixed
"by Jonsin for" → "by Jim Jonsin for"
fixed
Remove excess full-stop after Harvey Mason Jr. since his name can end the sentence in this context
Per the rules on chart positions being ordered geographically, make the US stuff the first para and follow that with the other countries; Canada should succeed it, but the current order of the other countries following these two would be fine. Also, remember what I said previously about how any chart positions mentioned in the lead must be written out here too.
I structured this around where the song was released first. Plus the UK comes before the US alphabetically?
"number fifty-eight on the UK Singles Chart on the chart dated" → "number 58 on the UK Singles Chart for the issue dated" per MOS:NUM
done
"fourth week it leaped from number fourteen to number three selling" → "fourth week, the song lept from number fourteen to number three, selling"
done
[32] should only be invoked every two sentences per WP:OVERCITE
done
"top ten single as a solo artist behind" → "top-ten single as a solo artist, following"
done
"with The Pussycat Dolls, it is her eighteenth top-forty" → "with the Pussycat Dolls, it is her 18th top-40"
done
"of 200,000 copies of the single." → "of 200,000 copies in the UK."
done
"in the United Kingdom and was one of the bestselling" → "in the UK and was one of the best-selling" but the copies are not sourced
done, removed the "best selling" bit as this is not true/subjective. 69 on the end of year top 100 is not best selling.
"remained on the chart" → "remained on the UK Singles Chart"
done
"In Ireland "Right There" debuted at number twenty-two" → "In Ireland, "Right There" debuted at number 22"
done
"number seven where it remained in the top ten" → "number seven and it remained in the top-ten"
Remove img since this is not necessary to show the recording studio
done
Shouldn't 50 Cent and any other personnel besides Scherzinger be wikilinked?
done
Use {{spaced ndash}} so there is the right space between credits and personnel
I see the template but I don't know where this has come from or why it is a thing. I can't see a policy reason for this. {{spaced ndash}} generates a dash with non-breaking spaces, however since there's no potential for each credit/personnel to split lines I don't understand where this rule has come from.
Hi @Kyle Peake, not surprised it was a met. I was trying to c/e it from original 2013 state! It was my intention to pick this up this evening but I've come down with the dreaded Miss C'Vid (* insert expletive here *). Its making it tricky for me to concentrate etc, hence I've been online doing more mundane things. I'll have to revisit this in a couple of days. Please bear with... >>Lil-unique1(talk) — 21:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lil-unique1 It is good to see that you have started to make considerable progress on this article, however the names of authors repeated in reception can keep the publications but should only have their surnames since these are supposed to be used once. --K. Peake11:18, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah - muumuuuse.com is allowed because the author Bradley Stern is a reliable source. He has written multiple times for MTV and NME which means it is allowed- Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications. I'll get to the other stuff later today. >>Lil-unique1(talk) — 08:08, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]