This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Ridvan Dibra is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
Well, if nobody can find an unreliable source in the article then I think removing the template would be the best idea.--Udha (talk) 10:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Udha: The article makes various grandiose claims regarding its subject without properly supporting them with reliable secondary sources. I'd argue that none of the sources are really reliable, although the "albanian books" source or whatever is probably the best. Either way, absolutely no reason to remove the template, as I don't think anyone is required to specify which sources are unreliable when it is clear that there aren't enough on this article for the claims being made. I'd suggest clicking the "Learn how and when to remove this template message" link on the template message for further information. Also, not your fault, but in the future, if you want to get my attention, I'd suggest pinging me so I'm more likely to respond in a timely manner and avoid this sort of confusion. R. A. Simmons Talk05:30, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
