Talk:Ride On, Ride On in Majesty!

A fact from Ride On, Ride On in Majesty! appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 April 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that "Ride On, Ride On in Majesty!" was once called one of the most popular Palm Sunday hymns?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ride On, Ride On in Majesty!.

Wikipedia

Christianity: Jesus / Music / Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Jesus work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Christian music.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Citation insufficient to prove point

A quote from a 1907 source - which is what the citation given boils down to - is insufficient to prove it's one of the most popular Palm Sunday hymns in the present day. While that it was stated to be such in 1907 is most likely notable, it's simply insufficient to make claims about the present popularity based on that. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 00:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]