Talk:Richmond Bridge, London/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 19:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

An interesting, well-illustrated article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Many taken by the nominator.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

The statement in the WP:lead that the bridge is Listed aught to be supported with a citation; and this fact amplified elsewhere in the article, with the date of Listing, etc. Interestingly that information can be found in (and via) reference 20..Pyrotec (talk) 20:49, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Anyway, I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on the article.Pyrotec (talk) 20:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)