Talk:Richards Heuer

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2024. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Espionage Low‑importance

	Richards Heuer is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This page should absolutely not be marked for deletion. You are mistaken if you shortsightedly believe that this is in any way not meeting wikipedia criteria to be kept. Dick Heuer is an ICON Of the US Intelligence Community whose work is internationally respected. He is also recognized in the field of neuroscience. You also have wikipedia pages on other respected Intelligence Community neuroscientists. I find it particularly interesting that after many years of hosting this page, now that I've tried to link to other pioneers in the field, you want to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahmiller8 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the previous comment. Heuer is an icon and deserves inclusion in Wikipedia. --66.211.206.21 (talk) 19:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richards J. Heuer deserves to have his own Wikipedia page even though he was totally wrong about Nosenko. Was Kisevalter Nash? (talk) 06:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]