Talk:Richard Nixon/GA3
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Excellent article! I made some minor wording and punc changes, but I see no major problems. I read the entire article and found it to be very well written and informative without omissions or errors. There are plenty of sources.
1. Well-written
- Yes
2. Factually accurate and verifiable
- Excellent amount of references
3. Broad in its coverage
- No ommissions, about entire life
4. Neutral
- Yes
5. Stable
- Yes
6. Illustrated
- Yes.
I would love to pass this article, but I am a novice in the GA reviewing field, so I'll ask for another opinion. Thanks for your work on the article so far! Reywas92Talk 22:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! Hopefully it will be completed soon. Thanks a lot! Best, Happyme22 (talk) 22:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to go ahead and pass this article to become a GA. This is a very good article and I hope that you will take it to WP:PR and WP:FLC. Reywas92Talk 02:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Best, Happyme22 (talk) 19:21, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to go ahead and pass this article to become a GA. This is a very good article and I hope that you will take it to WP:PR and WP:FLC. Reywas92Talk 02:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! Hopefully it will be completed soon. Thanks a lot! Best, Happyme22 (talk) 22:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)