Talk:Richard Krawiec

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

lukewarm

Even though I think Time Sharing is an excellent book, I thought I should include in my sentence about the NYT review that it was "lukewarm." Maybe i should have said "harsh", but I want to keep npov, which seems worse than with lukewarm. Lukewarm could be taken as subjective too, but the bare statement of a book review in nyt without Lukewarm" sounds like an endorsement. Suggestions?Rich (talk) 00:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

article becoming resume-like

I respect Krawiec's writing, but it's beginning to sound like a resume. I don't want to remove valuable information, but the information about him needs to be phrased less glowingly.Rich (talk) 08:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I went into the article and tried to make the language more neutral. But I'm not really sure how to handle this. People go to an encyclopedia to find out what someone has accomplished. I checked other author biographies in wikipedia and honestly can't understand why my page is considered less neutral than, say, the entries on Toni Morrison or Cormac McCarthy, or dozens of other writers whose pages don't feature a single reference to negative reviews. None of those writers have their entries flagged for lack of neutrality.

I'm not trying to give you a hard time, I'm just trying to understand. I've run this by other writers, who are in wikipedia, and they don't understand why my page is singled out either.

I'd like to see the flag removed.

I appreciate your taking the time to read this. richard krawiec —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.120.192.152 (talk) 15:42, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Rich (talk) 05:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

An indication of how to pronounce 'Krawiec' would be a useful addition. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 13:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]