Talk:Richard James Burgess

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conflict of Interest template

This article was created by and most of its contents have been added by a single-purpose account User:Myuzo. Due to the tone of the article, in November 2010 I added a conflict of interest template to the article and also informed User:Myuzo on his talk page of my suspicions; and since that date User:Myuzo has neither edited the article nor replied to my comments. Although quite a few Wikipedia users have subsequently edited the article, the article remains essentially as User:Myuzo created it.

The conflict of interest template exists to explain to the reader that the article may not meet Wikipedia's standards, and encourage editors to improve the article. The template should only be removed when the article has been improved/a concensus has been reached that the article meets Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. User:Burpelson AFB's edit summaries that "I'm not seeing any sign somone with COI has edited recently" or that the template is "ugly" do not justify removal of the template. memphisto 08:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that the template should remain until the number of cited assertions exceeds the number of links quickly dumped into the Refs section. Mr. Burgess' extensive and very notable accomplishments are readily backed up by verifiable sources. If someone's in a rush they could get busy turning those uncited Refs into citations... then there'd be nothing left to question. Except stuff like the only X-link (now gone) pointing to a number of Burgess' books for sale. Twang (talk) 08:42, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Richard James Burgess. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110807024201/http://www.artrocker.com/rrpedia/Fairlight_CMI to http://artrocker.com/rrpedia/Fairlight_CMI

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:54, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Richard James Burgess. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard James Burgess. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304080506/http://www.electricity-club.co.uk/html/int_burgess.html to http://www.electricity-club.co.uk/html/int_burgess.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Facts please not claims

More than once the wording of editor Hiddenstranger has been reverted in this Burgess entry. He is NOT "known" to have coined the term New Romantics. The claim has merely been "reported". As the Guardian citation clearly shows, this claim is "attributed" to him by writer Mark Hooper and yet his own text offers no supporting evidence. A subeditor has made an absolute claim in the headings to this article, again without any supporting evidence. None of the five citations attached to this sentence in Wikipedia offers an ounce of evidence. I invite Hiddenstranger to produce and cite published evidence of his interpretation. At least five other people are "reported" to have coined the term New Romantics. 217.155.200.241 (talk) 22:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]