This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Well, you are definitely entitled to your opinion. Are you looking to discredit the source of the information?
Just in case you think this may be an issue of hyperbole, another person in academia – with a much higher profile – was forced to resign around the same time for a similar incident. 07:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Well if they're rude to people they can hardly expect those people to respond with affection. Both Bornat and Summers should be old enough to know how the world works. Too bad if they haven't worked out how to get along with other people by now.
Anyway getting back to my question, who says the theory is controversial ? Wikipedia isn't supposed to. That's why we need to quote a source if we want to include that point of view. If we don't have one, and thus can't attribute it to anybody we shouldn't include it. That's basic NPOV as Larry Sanger originally phrased it. If someone says the theory is controversial, I'll happily quote them. But if nobody other than your esteemed self is of that opinion, you will need to take it elsewhere. -- Derek Ross | Talk03:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever. You said that the theory "looks good" to you. Either you are downright oblivious to the odiousness of such displays of ostentation, or are simply intellectually dishonest.
In any case, the source is included. If you can legally discredit the source, feel free to spin the content in question. If not, take your tripe elsewhere --User talk:Folajimi15:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
