Talk:Richard B. Hoover

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Missing scientific backgraound

According to Google Scholar, RB. Hoover wrote and published hundreds of papers in peer-reviewed journals, such as Science. His expertise (Astrobiology, microbial extremophiles, diatoms, X-Ray/EUV Optics -- according to his author page) should be mentioned. 132.68.32.31 (talk) 23:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, his bibliography can be included. But he became notorious and popular with his fringe paper. BatteryIncluded (talk) 02:23, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-neutral

User BrigKlyce has made a significant addition to this biography, improving it grately and also adding plenty of WP:Peacock terms. I noticed in his talk page that he works with Hoover and evidently is not neutral, and may even have a conflict of interest. I suggest to carefully review the article accuracy against the references provided. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 04:09, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the references seem OK. With the Peacock terms removed, it seems quite accurate. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 05:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have two, possibly three, stones ! Rocks 5hat have micro organisms that are àlive. Or havé personality,.

One of them copy my facial expressions?? They have an energy of their own. I'd love to know if they have any value? Because, yes, I'm interested in selling them if possible. 66.234.211.190 (talk) 01:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Meteorites, moon rock

Curious what kinds of rocks these are. 66.234.211.190 (talk) 01:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]