Talk:Richard B. Garnett

In memorial of Garnett

Richard Brook Garnett figures prominately in the 1993(?) movie "Gettysburg". His demise remains somewhat of a mystery although he obviously died in what is popularly known as "Pickett's Charge". The movie and the book "The Killer Angels" suggests an extreme devotion to duty, although both movie and book are speculative.
The town of Henderson NC named its main street after one (or both) of the Garnett cousins... Engr105th 06:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Ancestry ?

The article mentions his cousin, Robert Seldon Garnett...I wonder if the family descended from Thomas Garnett, who was one of the "Ancient Planters" (The earliest colonists) of Jamestown, Virginia ? Engr105th 15:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Garnett body?

A Union officer Colonel Norman J. Hall of 3rd Brigade/II Division reported "...The Second Brigade had again joined the right of my line, which now occupied the position orginally held by that command. Generals Garnett and Armistead {of Pickett's Division} were picked up near this point, together with many colonels and officers of other grades." Possibly providing an explanation of why Garnett's body was never found —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.53.145.70 (talk) 20:40, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

References

James L. Kemper

In part of the Garnett's article (Gettysburg and death) it is written that Garnett died along with Armistead and Kemper, but in Kemper's article it says that he (Kemper) was in the division that led Pickett's Charge, in which he was wounded and captured but rescued. Kemper died on April 7, 1895. Rovoobo oboovoR 01:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Garnett (along with Armistead[5] and Kemper) would be three of the 17 Confederate general officers lost during the three-day battle.

On a second reading it says he was lost during the three-day battle which doesn't necessarily mean dead. But perhaps needs to be better worded to avoid confusion? Rovoobo oboovoR 02:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes, that was confusing, using "lost" as a synonym for "casualty." I have corrected it. Thanks for pointing it out. Hal Jespersen (talk) 19:04, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard B. Garnett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080208215607/http://www.generalsandbrevets.com/sgd/daniel.htm to http://www.rocemabra.com/~roger/tagg/generals/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)