Talk:Richard Archer

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This Page

I suggest it is kept a careful eye on as currently much of it reads like a hagiography written by Archer himself. SimonRogers (talk) 14:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Age

born 72 or 77? this page says 72, hard fi page says 77...?Andycjp 02:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Every once and a while people change his birthdate, there seems to be a non stop argument on whether he was born in 1973 or 1977. Most hardccore fans insist he was born in 77 whereas many interviews in newspapers/magazines cite him as being 31.User:Paper Back Writer 23 20:47, 09 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And that argument seems to continue - no one has any idea, and many people insist it's '73. We need confirmation soon, although I'm thinking it was '77. 71.183.252.78 (talk) 04:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So what's his age? I still think his birth year was '77. 72.37.171.148 (talk) 14:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still not sure. Someone's gotta know. 96.246.232.202 (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why doesn't someone just ask? Ring up his manager, tell them you're from Wikipedia, job done. Lopifalko (talk) 11:00, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever he was born, definitely after 1953!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.178.195.157 (talk) 21:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HE WAS DEFINITELY BORN IN 1973. WHY ALL THE FUSS?

Because there is no proof of that. Sources say 1977. Why are YOU fussing? 72.37.171.148 (talk) 20:40, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this worth much as sources go? https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/officers/xl9S_DvYnPbNFmpLmzqLEO_7VJM/appointments — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:30C2:7100:452D:26CD:ACEC:FCE9 (talk) 20:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Archer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071223214846/http://www.hard-fi.com/discography.php to http://www.hard-fi.com/discography.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Richard Archer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]