Talk:Rich Communication Services

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Networking / Software / Security Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Dead initiative ?

Now that even Gartner acknowledge that XMPP has won the battle and will become the universal standard, is the initiative totally dead before any significant launch ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.88.118.245 (talk) 13:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In 2023 much has changed. RCS is supported globally by dozens of carriers, Google provides RCS globally in Messages, and Apple announced RCS would be supported in 2024. Recommend withdrawal. Rocketwidget (talk) 15:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rocketwidget, there is no need to reply to a 13-year-old post that has long gone stale. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spec link

Hi, Is there any spec. documents available on the RCS ? Aurelien. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.253.159.253 (talk) 13:50, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See http://www.gsmworld.com/our-work/programmes-and-initiatives/rcs/2415.htm -Ylva —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ylva Hubatsa (talk • contribs) 06:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article lacks neutrality

On October 21, 2008, IP address 62.213.130.74 edited this article, removing the relative neutrality that it previously had, e.g.: - "meaningless jargon" - "touted as a benefit of IMS" Also, the statement about "much of the capability of RSC is already available from ISPs is technically true, but deliberately misleading, because ISPs (in the sense intended by the comment) do not host Mobile Phones or have Mobile Phone Networks, which is the primary target of RCS. Thus these are editorial viewpoints.

I'll work on this entry if I can get some time. I'm interested if anyone disagrees with this assessment, however, because in at least 30 edits since October, no one has changed this. Benevo (talk) 02:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rich Communication Services. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130129013618/http://www.joynus.com:80/about/ to http://www.joynus.com/about/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article focuses on abandoned RCS standards, and is missing detail on Universal Profile RCS

A majority of the RCS Specifications is spent describing Release 1 - Release 8, RCS-e (enhanced), Joyn, with no sources. All of this has been abandoned by the GSMA in favor of Universal Profile RCS, and no MNOs are adding these old standards.

Major missing topics:

1. RCS Business Messaging (RBM) 2. Summary of MNO participation (RCS Launches) is both confusing and outdated. A much more accurate summary can be found here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14Ns9oV0Dh8_S5M-JHDvJ8sNHR6rpbiq2N6qZlP3g9zQ/ 3. How support varies (Person 2 Person interconnect, Worldwide interconnect, RBM, Device Support, Android app Support) 4. Future development, such as Android OS APIs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocketwidget (talk • contribs) 14:22, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also suggest talking about the "Google Guest" program and the concept of "gold" countries (GSMA term for countries where all major operators support RCS), probably in relation to one another. But I'm not sure where this should go, nor can I find a good source for the concept of a gold country.

EDITED to add*: I would also add a section on handset compatibility, but where exactly should it be placed? - 213.160.140.100 (talk) 12:16, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear introduction text - too technical

can someone please rewrite "provides phonebook polling (for service discovery)"? if it is important enough to be in the first paragraph it should be made understandable. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.195.58.239 (talk) 20:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting "RCS launches" table

In "Commercial Deployments", I have replaced the old and outdated intro (from GSMA circa 201Something) with a succinct and accurate summary of Commercial deployments:

Apple maintains a global list of carriers that support Universal Profile RCS messaging in Messages (Apple). (source links to Wireless carrier support and features for iPhone in the United States and Canada - Apple Support) Google Messages supports RCS with these carriers, and additionally supports RCS for all users globally, provided directly by Google Jibe if the carrier does not offer RCS. The GSMA states that Universal Profile support is optional in 4G, but mandatory in 5G networks and devices.

Given this, does it make sense to continue maintaining the old and outdated "RCS Launches" table? Almost all of it is historical launches, many non-Universal Profile, that are now defunct. I think it's just confusing and should just be deleted. Rocketwidget (talk) 15:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging @Sucrehypsy As this user has chatted with me on this topic before Rocketwidget (talk) 16:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]