Talk:Rhythmic contemporary
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Too colloquial and improperly cited
[edit]"played at clubs and school dances" and "though not too many" are completely unfounded statements until cited, as well as very colloquial without statistical evidence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackoutalterego (talk • contribs) 07:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Demographics
[edit]"...most of its core listeners makeup a multicultural mix of African-Americans, Hispanics and Asian-Americans as well as a core group of teens, young adults (mostly 18-34) and young females."
Mostly African-Americans, Hispanics and Asian-Americans? 80%? 90%? Any citations for this? Also, wouldn't young "females" be included in teens and young adults?
Stupidest ever chart name?
[edit]sometimes i think 'urban' is a stupid term. then i remember this chart. W guice 17:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Asian Americans
[edit]Asian Americans listen to Rhythmic CHR??? Any stats or proof? I think more caucasians listen to Rhythmic CHR than Asian Americans.
Just saying!
Hmm..
[edit]I've genuinely never seen such a broad generalization and absolutely outlandish un-cited "core demographic." What's "not too many"? 10? 15? A million? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.204.114.173 (talk) 05:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)