Talk:Rhynchonellata

Animals Low‑importance

Rhynchonellata is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gobbledegook

I realise that the subject of this article is a highly specialised area and has terminology consistent with that, but it really is gobbledegook. It also reads as if it has been "lifted" from one source but I cannot be bothered checking for plagiarism because my brain is rotting from just trying to make sense of it all. And I have a double-first from Cambridge, so it is anyone's guess what the "average reader" makes of it all.

I've added a heap of WP links and requests for clarification because I feel WP should not be overly specialist where it can be avoided - at least give people a chance to work out what is being said. Wiktionary might be the correct place for definitions but perhaps a separate article explaining them would do the job nicely. Obviously, I do not possess the knowledge to do either of these things. Sitush (talk) 07:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]