Talk:Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Rhodobacter sphaeroides be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Any Dutch speakers able to translate sentence and few other words that got left in Dutch? I can get some of the meaning (able to read German), but not enough to confidently translate it. I'm guessing "informatiedichtheid" is "information density."

The two citations in the text of the article are just numbers in parentheses, there are no links to sources, nor are the sources identified in any way. In fact, the only properly identified source if for the accepted name. This only compounds the problem that the English language version contains Dutch words. This page needs a lot of work. 128.231.88.7 (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The citations are being displayed properly now. My previous complaint about a lack of actual citation links was due to a cached version of the page displaying instead of the current. Thank you to Saippuakauppias. 128.231.88.7 (talk) 18:54, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"...is incredibly efficient." at what?

"It requires no unusual conditions for growth and is incredibly efficient." No idea what it's incredibly efficient at. Also lacks sources.--TFJamMan (talk) 11:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected misspellings

The name of the genus Rhodobacter and the names of two higher taxonomic levels were misspelled with "Rhod" instead of "Rhodo." I fixed the spelling. Siegele (talk) 22:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EurekAlert: New photocatalytic system converts carbon dioxide to valuable fuel more efficiently than natural photosynthesis

On base of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. See

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/997435

--Ernsts (talk) 07:50, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]