This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Why is Mr. Butler in the category 'Fictional Rapists'? Is it because of the forced kiss, or is there something in the book that isn't in the movie? In looking over the category, it includes statutory rapists like Randle McMurphy, and characters like Glenn Quagmire from Family Guy, where it's merely implied and never clearly stated that he's a rapist, but I think this is a bit of a stretch if it's just the one kiss. 173.60.214.178 (talk) 04:54, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per the Gone with the Wind#Dark Sexuality, the scene in chapter 54 has been interpreted as rape. However, the section also suggests that there are interpretations. Until there is some sort of paragraph summarizing the discussions on this page (as is appropriate as it does deal with Rhett), I believe the category is not appropriate. If the removal of the category is contested, then I believe a discussion is in order. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol20:42, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}