Talk:Rex Nemorensis

A fact from Rex Nemorensis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 January 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the rex Nemorensis was a Roman priest of Diana who got his position by killing the previous incumbent?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/January.

Wikipedia

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sectarian violence?

It also quite possible that this myth was a cleansing ritualization of sectarian religious violence. The ancients handled these problems with clarifying myths, while today we all too prone to resort to actual bloodshed.

I have moved this sentence to talk. It was misplaced; it formerly appeared at the end of the references. Sectarian violence was generally less likely among Greco-Roman pagans, whose gods were not exclusive and who were likelier to syncretize a strange god than to condemn its worship. I suspect this is original speculation, and is not NPOV in any case. Smerdis of Tlön 17:21, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of Latin

"Rex nemorensis" means plainly "king of the woods", or "forest king", from nemus meaning grove or woodland. I have no idea why anybody would say that it means king of Nemi. There was never any king of Nemi. There wasn't even a Nemi; in Roman times the temple of Diana Nemorensis (= Diana of the Woods) was associated with nearby Aricia (modern Ariccia). Imerologul Valah (talk) 12:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]