Talk:UNC Rex Healthcare

Hospitals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

I just started trying to update this content yesterday for our company. It resulted in the 2 messaages above the entry. How do I remove those?Mary8689 (talk) 14:05, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More exactly, Mary8689, your efforts brought it to the attention of other editors who manually added those two notices. The notice about primary sources can be removed if and only if a significant number of independent secondary reliable sources are used to support as much of the content as possible. The COI tag remains as long as an employee or close associate is actively editing the page. DES ^(talk) 15:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rex hospital

Why is it of primary importance to list early in the article that the man who donated the money to start Rex hospital was a slave owner? 204.85.209.209 (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Status as an owner of enslaved people is essential to understanding the source of the bequest. 136.56.19.212 (talk) 03:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Care to elaborate on this? Your statement itself makes no sense. 71.77.16.16 (talk) 14:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]