Talk:Revolution Helicopter Corporation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Revolution Helicopter Corporation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Rotorcraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Kansas City Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about Kansas City, Missouri, and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kansas CityWikipedia:WikiProject Kansas CityTemplate:WikiProject Kansas CityKansas City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Article name

Any reason why this cant be just Revolution Helicopter Corporation as per WP:NAME (The legal status of the company (such as Inc., plc or LLC), is not normally included) MilborneOne (talk) 18:45, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It should be! We don't use "Inc" in article titles. - Ahunt (talk) 20:03, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done! - Ahunt (talk) 20:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New version of company history

User:Rotorhistory has now added a very odd, definitely very POV version of events to the history of this article. This is not to say this text couldn't be somehow deconflicted with the published references, but this editor has not provided any references for this text, which makes it look like personal opinion or original research. Unfortunately, while it may or may not have any merit, I have had to remove it, because it doesn't cite any sources. It has also been removed by an Admin, too, User:MilborneOne for the same reasons.

Note to User:Rotorhistory: please stop edit warring to try to include this text and instead try to gain consensus here instead. You can start off by providing a reference - where are you getting this version of events? - Ahunt (talk) 01:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]