Talk:Revival of Evangelion

	Anime and manga portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
	This redirect is supported by the Evangelion work group.

why?

this is good im a big fan of the evangelion series and the movies but one thin i want to know why did the last 2 epidose end like that

'cause life suck... I guess... T.J. Fuller, Jr. 14:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're on the wrong talk page. The ending is handled in the TV article, particularly the production section. --Gwern (contribs) 15:03 14 September 2009 (GMT)

US Distributor

Yeah, Manga Entertainment has the rights to Death/Rebirth and End, but do they really have rights to Revival? I'd love to see it released here, but since it hasn't, is there really a distributor? T.J. Fuller, Jr. 14:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Given the dingy state of this article, the problems with its content and structure, and the low probability that there's ever going to be enough info to make it a full article, I say let's merge this into the NGE media article and be done with it. Thoughts? Willbyr (talk | contribs) 14:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose it's a separate recut film, it should not be merged into the list. 70.55.86.100 (talk) 20:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That may be true, but it doesn't address the problems with the article. Willbyr (talk | contribs) 17:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Might work. It is more of a rerelease than an original film. But I can´t agree with the argument, that there is to few info. The problem is, the content is practically identical to the previous 2 films/releases. Only background info could be added. Something about it being the original intended form of the films (like a Director´s Cut of the films). To be honest I´d even suggest to treat the two films as one film in two parts (for comparison, see the Kill Bill article), since they were intended to be shown as one film, but were split because of production problems. 87.174.230.181 (talk) 18:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree....this is only a remake, it can be listed in the main article and be briefly mentioned. the article alone is quite useless. God i hate wiki editors...seriously too much fandom...i think i'm going to have to fix all of the NGE articles all by myself. oh and please merge this with the main articleBread Ninja (talk) 17:38, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support. A few visually-tweaked scenes and edits don't make it a different movie; they make it a re-release, like many re-releases Gainax has done. (Heck, they've been doing it again for Rebuild 1!).

Now, where to merge it? The media article would work, but I think EoE would make most sense. --Gwern (contribs) 15:01 14 September 2009 (GMT)