Talk:Reverse stratigraphy

Archaeology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Reverse stratigraphy is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discussion on removed source

@Indi750:, I restored the removed reference as it is a reliable source for the subject at hand. Just because you 'don't like it' is not a reason to exclude it. Indeed, Wikipedia is not censored. Also must be invoked is No original research. We talk about it straight from the source, which happens to be this. I've reverted due to this. I'm curious of your argument for omitting it. Thanks. Tutelary (talk) 16:35, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Tutelary, I restored my modification. If the reference has been published in a reliable journal, it has been criticized in this same journal. Anyone who has a bit of knowledge in archaeology and sedimentology and has read the description of the published Tam Pa Ling site would immediatly understand that the stratigraphy in undisturbed. According to the critic published against the authors of the referenced article, it seems that they have mistaken the published dates for the site. I hope that those arguments will help. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indi750 (talk • contribs) 08:03, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]