Talk:Revelstoke Mountain Resort

	Sports portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Untitled

The material on this page was compiled from a small number of documents on the official project web site. The site is no longer operational, however, and has been redirected to a "Sotheby's Canada" page with a single update from early 2006 (or perhaps late 2005). An example of the cached data is here [1], which includes most of the facts in the article. If the site comes back up I'll add them as refs, but frankly I don't think this is going to happen. Maury 22:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

mistakes

I found mistakes in the article - For example, Sotheby's is not a new name for the group of investors, it is an prestigious international realty company who has been assigned to selling property at the resort. For the most correct information, go to discoverrevelstoke.com Susy71.96.151.227 03:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sotheby's Canada has existed for about one year from what I can tell. They are, as the web site states, formed as another offshoot of a company formed in 1976. The original site I found suggested they were formed by the investors/organizers listed on the web site you noted. Are you sure you are saying anything different than what it used to say? Maury 21:20, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was claimed to have the fourth largest vertical in the world. That´s incorrect so I removed it. For example Chamonix 2738 m, Matterhorn 2375 m, Murren 2171 m, Alpe D´Huez 2193 m, Davos 2034 m, Paradiski 2036 m to mention a few over 2000 m vertical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.229.150.168 (talk) 23:04, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

discrepancies

it's obviously not a major concern but it seems bizzare to liken the future size of revelstoke to panorama and vail when these two resorts are not nearly the same size as each other.Vail is nearly twice as big as panorama,and is in fact the second biggest resort in north america.regardless,still cant wait to ski revelstoke.79.196.199.76 (talk) 17:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]