Talk:Revelations of the Dark Mother/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 00:50, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- "Like The Book of Nod, it has a "vampire scholar" framing device and makes heavy use of illustration, and has the same verse structure" to "Like The Book of Nod, it has a "vampire scholar" framing device; it makes heavy use of illustration and has the same verse structure."
- "on the character of Lilith" to "on the character Lilith"
- "with Lilith—Caine opposing Adam—Abel as both husband-and-wife/brother-and-brother and stepmother-and-stepson/father-and-son, serving as analogies for opposing life styles – hunting/blood-spilling and gardening/blood-spilling – and adding oppositions of magical/mundane, darkness/light, and wilderness/garden." I don't undertstand the Lilith-Caine opposing Adam-Abel part.
- Tried to rewrite it, it's kinda hard to parse in the source and I ended up mirroring how it was presented there.--AlexandraIDV 05:22, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
That's it. Once these are addressed I can pass. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 01:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Abryn: I've tried to address the issues you brought up; also ended up splitting the first reception paragraph in two since it was getting kinda long.--AlexandraIDV 05:23, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- All righty, passed. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 07:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you~! ^_^--AlexandraIDV 07:46, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- All righty, passed. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 07:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)