Talk:Revaluation of fixed assets/Archives/2014

Confusion

From VfD:

Huh? I assume the article is about India. Is it a copyvio? And what does that last paragraph mean? RickK 08:11, Aug 15, 2004 (UTC)

• Delete: It's a business manual page. If it's not copyvio, it's original. We do, in fact, need more material on economics and business, but this is specialist and is addressing a specifically implied audience of specialists. It won't work in an encyclopedia, and its title is so out of the way as to be impenetrable. Geogre 12:23, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Postdlf 19:25, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Weak keep, as long as it's not copyvio. Just because it's a specialist topic doesn't mean it doesn't belong in Wikipedia (quite the opposite IMO—Wikipedia is great for looking up terms you're unfamiliar with). In desperate need of cleanup though. — Gwalla | Talk 21:31, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Heavy heavy smell of copyvio. Delete, probable copyvio, unreadable style. -- Cyrius|✎ 07:01, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Tough one. It is definitely an accounting text. The writing is probably too poor to be a copyvio. I suspect it's a first draft just dropped into Wikipedia. Some of the concepts are valid and are not covered in any existing article I know of. However, much of the article fails to follow GAAP (UK or US) and could create more confusion than help. The title's okay for an article. Recommend moving to Clean-up for a month or two. I'll try next week if I can find my old textbook. Delete if not cleaned up in a reasonable time. Rossami 00:14, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, but do examine for copyvio. If none, it's off to cleanup for this one. Kim Bruning

end moved discussion