Talk:Return to Innocence (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Untitled comments

I just made this page in agreement with the guidelines of the WikiProject, Wikipedia:WikiProject Films after discovering there was no page for this film. If you have seen this film and remember the verdict of the case (I forgot what happened), please add it to the spolier section. Thanks and if you have any issues with the page please leave me a message. Caf3623 05:13, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

looks good! --Shane ^{(talk/contrib)} 05:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glen was acquitted of charges after the boy admits he lied about it - but Glen is "marked" for life just because of the accusation, as there are people who still think that "he got away with it". Hence the title of the movie... once accused of sexual abuse on a minor, there is no return to innocence, because people are so obsessed with pedophilia - the acquitted are still thought of as pedophiles, even though they were proven innocent - quite a tragedy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.157.227.207 (talk) 09:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Returnt1.jpg

Image:Returnt1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]