Talk:Rethink Mental Illness

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

I think this charity only operates in England?

Certainly from looking at their structure, from their website - http://www.rethink.org/contact_us.html

The Northern Irish equivalent is Mind Wise New Vision, the Scottish body is still called the NSF, and in Wales it operates under Hafal. 94.168.147.34 (talk) 09:31, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removal of critisicm of early psychosis

Despite my obvious non-WP:NPOV I have removed the sentence as the article is very out of date and the criticisms are no longer valid. I could add the new evidence here, but this is already on the early psychosis article and would drift away from the core article .Happy to discuss futher. cheers Earlypsychosis (talk) 08:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All those criticisms from 2003[1], and more, are discussed in ongoing terms in this 2009 literature review.[2] Including lack of evidence of sustained benefit, arbitrary definitions of key concepts, a danger of stigmatizing young people and over-medicalizing common experiences, questionable benefits from antipsychotics and serious adverse effects especially in younger people, and focusing expertise and resources on select individuals and away from those most in need.

I agree this article isn't really the place to cover these points though (the early intervention article really does need to though...) - but since it does describe a process of acceptance and consensus since 1995, it should also indicate the non-acceptance and skepticism (that's not even to mention alternative approaches like the Hearing Voices Movement. Pile-Up (talk) 03:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Rethink Mental Illness

Cyberbot II has detected links on Rethink Mental Illness which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.time-to-change.org.uk/
Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Rethink Mental Illness

Cyberbot II has detected links on Rethink Mental Illness which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.time-to-change.org.uk/
Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:30, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]