Talk:Rest of the world in sports and games

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
Requested articles (Sports)
Requested articles (Association football)
Requested articles (Association football women)
Requested articles (Motor sports)
Requested articles (Estonian sportspeople)
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup :
* Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state)
* Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.)
* Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing.
* Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Expand : Professional sports (crucial article explaining the salaried undertaking of sports)
* Sport industry (currently a sub-stub)
Photo : for pages listed in Category:Wikipedia requested images of sports and games and sub-categories.
Stubs : work on articles in Category:Sports stubs
Update : List of world sports championships
Other :
- Translate the page of sport in each country from corresponding article in other language Wikipedia to English Wikipedia which was marked in red.
- Categorize: Gather all (major/olympic) sports to be part of this project
- RfCs: answer requests for comment

Games (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Games, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GamesWikipedia:WikiProject GamesTemplate:WikiProject GamesGames articles

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 21 August 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 07:50, 29 August 2015 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Rest of the world → Rest of the world in sports and games – This is not about "rest of the world" such as the non-First World, or the non-aligned nations. It should be moved to make way for a set index for the various uses. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 05:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support daftly meaningless title at present. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and In ictu oculi, completely meaningless and unhelpful title at present.Pincrete (talk) 09:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

edit conflict In ictu oculi - You know stuff! Any thoughts on rulings related to the use of quotation marks. In this case I think that a title such as "Rest of the world" in sports and games would make good sense. Greg Kaye 09:15, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know I'm afraid. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:03, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think the proposed name is bit wordy - what about Rest of the world (sport) instead? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If we did that, we would probably have others who would argue that the move should then be reverted per WP:PRECISE. The proposed option is a more WP:NATURALDAB option. Steel1943 (talk) 14:56, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But it is naturally disambiguating the article from a concept that doesn't exist. — AjaxSmack 16:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

...What a conundrum... Steel1943 (talk) 16:30, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The current name is too generic. It doesn't give any idea that this is only about sports. JIP | Talk 18:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The intro sentence says "sports" and "games", so also games. (and it's carrying a game-stub) This used to be WPCHESS reflecting the original version of the article, that had emphasis on chess, so games. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:01, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the proposed move because the proposed title strongly implies there is a larger coherent encyclopedic concept of the "rest of the world" of which this article is a subset. Support a move to a title with a parenthetical disambiguator like that suggested by User:Lugnuts above for the reasons given by other users. What do others think? — AjaxSmack 16:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also fail to see what the actual confusion is too. The article has existed since 2003 and is only now an issue? What other primary use(s) of "Rest of the world" are there? If there are others outside of sport, they can be handled by a hatnote/dab page. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 16:27, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree but gratuitous addition of text in titles to "disambiguate" is a growing fad. I suppose I'm getting into the spirit, too. — AjaxSmack 16:35, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not just for disambiguation, this is for WP:PRECISION, since the current title is insufficient to describe the topic accurately. And the term "rest of the world" actually is used in the real world in contexts other than sports and games. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:29, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Rest of the world" is simply far too generic to be about sports, games, or any other singular field of interest. If anything, "rest of the world" should be either a disambiguation page, or an article about the view of one geographical or ethnic entity towards, you know, all the others in the world. JIP | Talk 18:58, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support either Rest of the world in sports and games or "Rest of the world" in sports and games. Greg Kaye 23:15, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Happened on this discussion purely by chance, but the need for change seems obvious. BPK (talk) 15:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.