Talk:Respiratory droplet
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Respiratory droplet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
A fact from Respiratory droplet appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that surgical masks provide protection against diseases spread by respiratory droplets (pictured), but not those spread by airborne transmission? Source: [1] [2]
- Reviewed: 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maharashtra
5x expanded by John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk). Self-nominated at 02:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC).
- New enough (expanded from redirect March 31), long enough (5,397 characters), well-cited throughout to reputable sources, neutral, and free from troubling close para/copyvio issues (the one source with more than seven or eight words appearing in the article is from a PD FDA source). Hook is 134 characters, definitely both timely and interesting and useful, and cited to and in ref 12. QPQ done and no image (although the sneezing one from the article is pretty expressive and could definitely be used). Good to go! —Collint c 22:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Good idea—I've added the photo. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 23:41, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Image is good to go and an FP to boot! —Collint c 20:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- The article has a few "citation needed" tags. Yoninah (talk) 16:07, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- @Bobamnertiopsis and Yoninah: Fixed. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 01:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. Restoring tick per Collins' review. Yoninah (talk) 01:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Bobamnertiopsis and Yoninah: Fixed. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 01:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
(Respiratory?) Droplet
[edit][3] Do flushing toilets, wet‐cleaning surfaces, showering or using tap water, or spraying graywater actually cause respiratory droplets? Or just "droplet"? --Horus (talk) 08:02, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Why nobody advices to cough to ground direction?
[edit]Droplet spread without source control: up to ~8 meters (26 ft) for sneezes and coughs, up to ~2 meters (6.6 ft) for talking. For a masked person, these distances are reduced.
What if one squats and coughs down, so that the droplets hit the ground? Then coughing would be much safer?