Talk:Resonant inelastic X-ray scattering

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spectroscopy (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spectroscopy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SpectroscopyWikipedia:WikiProject SpectroscopyTemplate:WikiProject SpectroscopySpectroscopy articles

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

https://people.ifm.liu.se/marma/
Triggered by \bpeople\.ifm\.liu\.se/marma\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 20:03, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 02:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Diagram caption

I believe the caption is in error since ωk is not an energy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.221.0.3 (talk) 16:33, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think the diagram is kinda misleading, the final states always show an exciton (electron in valence band) but most of the RIXS work is on collective excitations, which don't effect the single electron energy.

Tone of Article

It reads like an advert for the technique.

Furthermore, it should be written in the passive voice.

IXS or RIXS?

In my courses on master-level I see it commonly refered to as IXS and not RIXS. Should maybe the article name be IXS? Is it always resonant? And even if so is RIXS really the more commonly used name? --Blue.painting (talk) 21:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think X-ray Raman scattering might be the page you're looking for. These pages really need some work and consistent terminology but it's a bit out of my comfort zone. Pelirojopajaro (talk) 07:46, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Thankyou for the significant changes in the articles. Overall it was very informative but I would like to suggest you to replace all the black listed links. Thankyou.

Alisheem (talk) 13:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Review article

Hi! thank you for the article improvement. I found it very interesting. I know few things about characterization methods but I never heard of this, so it was very useful to read it. Frafra27 (talk) 14:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Observations and suggestions for improvements

The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following an expert review of the article within the Science, Technology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in July 2023.

This page is the revision of an existing page. I could of course check the changes made by Stefano Elli, but it is somewhat clumsy. Therefore, evaluation of the scientific content of the page reflects in part the existing state of the scientific content.

--Aandurro (talk) 12:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]