Talk:Residual-excited linear prediction
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Isn't it used again for mobile phones communications? --Čikić Dragan (talk) 21:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
CELP (and variants such as ACELP and RCELP) is, but RELP is dead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmvalin (talk • contribs) 23:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
What about this?
"... Many variations of this class of adaptive predictive coders exists. The ETSI-GSM Full Rate codec (GSM 06.10) which is implemented in most of the GSM digital cellular networks is an example of the family of RELP (Residual Excited Linear Prediction) coders." [1] --Čikić Dragan (talk) 12:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
GSM-FR is a multi-pulse codec. As far as I'm concerned, it's about as close as RELP as it is to CELP (actually, I would have said closer to CELP). It's definitely unlike RELP in that typically RELP codecs would only encode the residual in a small band (e.g. <1 kHz) and then extent it to fill the full 4 kHz bandwidth. GSM-FR on the other hand codes the entire band with a few pulses. But it's still really ancient/crappy anyway. Jmvalin (talk) 23:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
2008-01-30 Automated pywikipediabot message
[edit] | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |