Talk:Devolved, reserved and excepted matters

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Railways

Are you sure that railways is still reserved? My understanding was that Labour were making a big song and dance last year about railways being the first area of reserved power to be devolved since the Scotland Act. Eg, see the Transport Scotland article. --Mais oui! 10:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

US

We got to have a seperate article for the use of the term in the US.Cameron Nedland 02:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. --Mais oui! 15:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks bro.Cameron Nedland 23:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a pleasure. --Mais oui! 23:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 August 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 19:46, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reserved and excepted matters → Reserved and excepted matters of the Parliament of the United Kingdom – the current title is not very specific and changing it would make it much clearer that it’s about the Reserved and excepted matters of the UK Parliament 2A02:C7F:5621:2A00:B1F1:B312:1655:D2A3 (talk) 17:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - The proposed title is what is needed for this article and does make things clearer in knowing it’s regarding devolved arrangements within the United Kingdom. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 07:50, 23 August 2018 (UTC))[reply]
Support- I also support this idea and agree the title of this article needs to be clearer. (2A02:C7F:5621:2A00:58BC:722A:20D:F7D8 (talk) 21:28, 24 August 2018 (UTC))[reply]

WP:RM#Nom. Dekimasuよ! 19:46, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The Lead and hatnotes are perfectly capable of clearing up any possible confusion with similar articles. - BilCat (talk) 22:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:PRECISION. While I generally advocate a little bit of "preemptive disambiguation" where the geographic context is unclear, I don't think it's called for in this case. "Reserved matters" and "excepted matters" are not very common phrases, thus it's obvious it's some kind of legal jargon. As BilCat said, lead and hatnotes are perfectly capable of clearing any possible confusion. No such user (talk) 11:28, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.