Talk:Resen, North Macedonia

	North Macedonia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North Macedonia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North Macedonia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North MacedoniaWikipedia:WikiProject North MacedoniaTemplate:WikiProject North MacedoniaNorth Macedonia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Resen, Macedonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061115143327/http://www.exploringmacedonia.com/?ItemID=7D670A5C9473FA4BBD3C4337BB2C8227 to http://exploringmacedonia.com/?ItemID=7D670A5C9473FA4BBD3C4337BB2C8227

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:54, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prapastathis

Future Perfect at Sunrise I saw your note at Greeks in North Macedonia. I can't access this source, recently added by the same user, making the provocative claim that [were equal numbers of "Slavophone Greeks" and Bulgarians in the late Ott. era]. Can you?--Calthinus (talk) 19:12, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My bad -- here's the proper diff [[1]]. --Calthinus (talk) 19:18, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can't access that source either. Of course, the crucial question would be what could possibly be meant by "Slavophone Greeks" in that context – certainly not the same thing as what our Slavophone Greeks article is about, so at the very least, that wikilink is misleading. Most likely, if there were any demographic figures relating to these groups from the Ottoman era, what they would have counted would be adherents of the Greek Orthodox church versus adherents of the Bulgarian Exarchate. Ethnically these would have been pretty much the same group. To what extent religious adherence to the Greek church (i.e. the Ecumenical Patriarchate) would have correlated with a "Greek" political orientation, at that specific time and place, I can't say. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:11, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot to mention other cases Calthinus. The same editor added content based on a dubious Greek source to Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia claiming that in 1883 the entire population of the Kastoria region was Greek ("Slavophone Greek" and other similar terms mean Greek who speaks a language other than Greek). All sources used on the matter at Kastoria say that in that time Kastoria had Bulgarians, Greeks, Turks, Albanians and Jews. Only a part of the population identified as ethnically Greek. One of many controversial edits of the editor was on Ekrem İmamoğlu. I cant check all edits of the editor because I lack the time needed but I am posting these examples here to attract your attention and urge you to keep an eye on the editor. They may have issues caused by the lack of experience on enwiki. Cheers, Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I tagged this one as vn [[2]] on Kastoria. I don't want to BITE but it does not look great...--Calthinus (talk) 20:34, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Name

In lots of cities in West macedonia, turkish is added together with the majority language of the municipality in which the city is located. Usually its for historic reasons, same thing for aromanian in krusevo.

So i wanted to start a discussion wether or not it is appropriate to add albanian, and possibly turkish, in the name section of the city (not the municipality), considering the Saraj palace was built by an albanian, and in the past there was a muslim and christian minority present.

I didnt want to get reckless and add the name without consulting with someone here. I wont change anything without comming to an agreementAtlonche (talk) 22:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is enough of that detail in the Name section Beat of the tapan (talk) 01:30, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well thats obvious, my point was that lots of cities were there are minorities in nmk have their names added in the lead section. Such is the case in Tetovo, Gostivar and Kicevo with the turkish name. I mean its kind of a double standard, considering there are people in resen who are both albanian and turkish Atlonche (talk) 16:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also why is the greek name added? Were there native greeks in resen? Atlonche (talk) 16:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beat of the tapan is right, when we have a Name section, we don't include the relevant names in the lead. --Local hero ^talk 18:52, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thats ok by me, why is albanian put after turkish and aromanian though? The albanian communities in the past were larger than turks and vlachs, and nowadays only turks outnumber them. I think after macedonian we should put albanian in the name section, for the reasons stated above. And certainly not after aromanian. Atlonche (talk) 19:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the section was written in any particular order. It just sort of evolved that way. --Local hero ^talk 19:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah seems so actually. Well then my change shouldnt be a problem. I think so atleast, what u think? Atlonche (talk) 19:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I just basically switched Albanian's spot with Aromanian's. --Local hero ^talk 19:11, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah this works. Thnx mate.

Atlonche (talk) 19:14, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah this works. Thnx mate Atlonche (talk) 19:14, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]