Talk:Reptilian humanoid

Mythology Mid‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels: Fantasy Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dragonborn (Dungeons & Dragons) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 17 March 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Reptilian humanoid. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

I don't really understand what's in this article that isn't in List of reptilian humanoids

I suppose a massive amount of input from someone knowledgeable on the subject might be in order, but that's not me. Serendi ^podous 13:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's the same difference between Car and List of Ford vehicles. One covers the concept, the other is a list of examples. Right now it's a stub, but it will be filled in with more descriptive information._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 July 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Reptilians are real- Divine revelation from the God of the Bible whose knowledge will forever surpass that of man. 2019 71.244.111.160 (talk) 16:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reptilian humanoids and anthropomorphic reptiles

these are not the same thing and anthropomorphic reptile is a reptile in the shape of a human being to some degree. A reptilian humanoid would be a humanoid who is to some degree in the shape of a reptile. This article is talking about anthropomorphic reptiles 142.163.195.205 (talk) 00:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Under “games”, and in the last paragraph, the newest and recent Dracthyr race in world of Warcraft should be added. Like D&D’s Dragonborn, they are humanoid dragon people

It should be noted that dracthyr are a playable race that players are able to play as, and aren’t just NPCs like nagas.

Dracthyr were introduced in the latest expansion, Dragonflight. CaptainRelyk (talk) 07:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Rehsarb (talk) 16:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lizard People

"The reptilian conspiracy theory alleges that shape-shifting reptilian aliens control Earth."

This is wrong. It is merely a metaphor for people that act unhuman, and cold-blooded. 79.106.203.57 (talk) 17:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source? --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled comment

This should be changed from conspiracy to unproven hypothesis. Or a section added. There is a hypothesis about a reptilian race that does not involve conspiracy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1011:B1AF:CB82:847B:2AA6:C683:4B47 (talk) 02:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC) How are you annointed to declare that this is a " fictional" concept? Im not saying its fact or fiction, I believe a more accurate and honest statement is to say that the subject is debatable,due to the lack of enough readily accessible information that would allow the general public to render conclusions to disprove or unquestionably support either concept. Whether information and data is known ro some level to support/ disprove is also unknown.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7081:1402:2C47:79C:499:6DEE:C631 (talk) 23:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent comment. Wikipedia proports neutrality on controversial topics. But they consistently promote the "mainstream" (aka lamestream) media and government approved scientific / historical theories, despite any facts to the contrary. It was sad, but expected, that the once independent Wikipedia would fall to become just another tool of the system. It's been a decade since I opened a Wikipedia page for any purpose, and it'll be a decade, or more, before I bother with it again. It's nothing but a foul, stagnant, festering swamp of dead and dying ideas. 2601:80:C502:B4E0:5121:B3E9:1EAE:C82D (talk) 16:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing wrong with excluding crazy bullshit from the set of reasonable ideas, and the Wikipedia rules explicitly say so. See WP:FRINGE. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Dinosaurid

I have reverted the addition of [[:File:Dinosauroid.jpg|thumb|The Dinosauroid, a hypothetical anthropomorphic sapient dinosaur.]] to the article because it is a depiction of a thought experiment on how bipedal dinosaurs might have evolved if they had survived the K-Pg extinction event, and has nothing to do with the cryptid. Donald Albury 20:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]