Talk:Replicator Carter

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Television: Stargate

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
	This redirect is supported by the Stargate task force.

There was a Sixth in Unnatural Selection

I'm not sure whether the human form replicators are made from the same blocks. - Zarboki 16:20, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sixth/Seventh

Wasn't the Sixth in Unnatural Selection a remnant of one of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th?--Alfakim | (talk) 16:17, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How could Sixth be a remnant when all her siblings were still living in that episode? Are you thinking of the one left-over replicator in "New Order"? The humanoid replicators First through Sixth were introduced in "Unnatural Selection", and a seventh was seen in "New Order", so Replicarter is probably the eighth. Noneofyourbusiness 01:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

pic

the pic is of sam, not RC. RC never wears a top like that.-- Alfakim -- talk 03:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An Errant Sentence?

"Fifth intended for RepliCarter to govern the Replicator race with him, and be his consort (of sorts; even human-form-Replicators do not copulate). " Certainly they do not reproduce sexually, but I see no reason why they would be incapable of the physical act of copulation. Noneofyourbusiness 01:15, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

She is rarely seen without clothes

Vandalism? Not been faithful watching SG-1, so dunno, but that sounds like a smirky-smirky to me. — Mike • 01:01, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's likely referring to the fact she appeared nude, albeit with the "naughty" portions of her body obscured, when she was "born" in "New Order, Part 2." 67.171.163.212 20:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is the name "RepliCarter" even used in the show?

I can't recall ever hearing the name "RepliCarter" in the show, just Replicator Carter. I always thought that RepliCarter was a fan name. So is it? Whichever is the case, I think that the article should refer to her in the same form as the title of the article. Currently, the article is called "Replicator Carter", but talks about her as "RepliCarter". It needs to be one or the other, not both. Thunderforge 03:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the show, the name "Replicator Carter" has appeared only twice in its entire history. However, 95% of the time anyone speaks of her, including the directors/producers, they call her RepliCarter because that's just how shes informally known. It's a simpler, easier name. So we mention at the top that that's the more common name, and use it for the rest. A bit like "Stargate SG-1 (more commonly abbreviated, SG-1) is ........... In SG-1's third year...." --Alfakim-- talk 15:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Replicarter-traps-daniel.jpg

Image:Replicarter-traps-daniel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Replicarter-contacts-sgc.jpg

Image:Replicarter-contacts-sgc.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]