Talk:Replaceable You/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 18:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]- "Bart and Martin enlist the aid of Professor Frink who then enlists a larger group of nerds to remotely hack into the robot software and make them nice again. " Switch it up a little
- "The episode has received mixed reviews from television critics. " -> "Replaceable You" has...
- Why is ref 8 in italics?
Good critical reception and production sections. Plot is also well-written. The reliability of this source gave me cause for concern before I saw that it was an audio recording (which I believe is fine). I see there's been a few IP edits lately, but you have done a good job fighting the erosion of this article. Hope you keep it on your watchlist! Happy to pass this one as a good article (with the belief that you'll fix the above 3 comments). Nice work, Ruby 2010/2013 19:26, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- All done! Thanks for the review! :) Theleftorium (talk) 20:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC)