Talk:Remittance man

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Empire Low‑importance

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: History Low‑importance

	Australia portal Remittance man is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian history (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

}}

Untitled

I was of the understanding that in the 19th century it was common for the eldest son to inherit the family estates and/or businesses with any younger sons receiving little to nothing in the way of inheritance. However, there was a duty on the heir to see to his brothers’ support by taking a yearly percentage of any profit made from the estates and/or businesses, and divide it among his younger brothers. It was this yearly remittance to these brothers where the 'term remittance men' was coined. Some of these remittance men went on to become wealthy or famous in their own right, sadly however, for many of these men this yearly income came too easily, and was drank, gambled and frittered away, which led to the term 'remittance men' being look upon with ill favour. R. Granbois 03:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Time for a re-write, with refs

The article lacks good quality references, and it makes unsourced claims about remittance men doing well. Unfortunately, the historic usage indicates otherwise, and I can see no justification for including Vanderbilt. I'll give it a good going-over. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 10:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced or otherwise, this article makes an interesting and eye-opening read, explaining many a story and novel of the times. Let us keep it that way. Zezen (talk) 08:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(This comment appears to be a response to what I wrote a couple of years ago, so I've taken the liberty of connecting them by removing the comment's separate heading.) Thank you for your positive opinion of the article. As you can see here and here, immediately after I offered to give the article a good going over, I did so, with dozens of edits. I finished that editing spree a few weeks later, and since then it has stayed essentially the same - which isn't to say that it can't still be expanded or improved. If you have sources to hand, please do so! I'd be delighted to read more about remitance men and women. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 11:07, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Analysis and examples

That's the heading, and yet there isn't a single example. Not one name. 86.177.94.238 (talk) 20:56, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]