Talk:Religious discrimination against Wiccans
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Merge into Religious discrimination against Neopagans?
[edit]I think this article is long enough to stand on it's own. If it should be merged wouldn't it be better to merge it with Wicca? // Liftarn
- WP:SS. If it is to stand on its own, it has to be renamed to religious discrimination against Wiccans, since the term "persecution" doesn't appear in a single referenced instance referring to modern times. The only "persecution" discussed here concern the Early Modern witch-hunts, which I grant you had the character of persecution, but which has nothing to do with Wicca, and which while religiously motivated was not directed against a group defined by a religious creed. dab (đł) 11:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds resonable, but we should probably wait a few days to get more views. // Liftarn
- Liftarn, if you don't, who is going to disagree? It can always be moved back with a click. We can still debate this once disagreement is voiced. dab (đł) 11:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think you are doing a lot of major changes without seeking consensus first. I suggest you calm down and bring it up on the respective talk pages first. // Liftarn
- Liftarn, if you don't, who is going to disagree? It can always be moved back with a click. We can still debate this once disagreement is voiced. dab (đł) 11:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds resonable, but we should probably wait a few days to get more views. // Liftarn
Unindent for sanity. Liftarn and dab: you can't go on moving and reverting like this. Personally I was happy with the merge but I'm very unhappy that the pair of you are in a revert war here. Leave the page where it is now and get other opinions on the merger. One or both of you are very close to a three revert violation. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 10:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)