Jump to content

Talk:Religion of the Shang dynasty/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Strongman13072007 (talk · contribs) 09:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Remsense (talk · contribs) 18:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How long would it take for a review, btw?Strongman13072007 (talk) 00:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a fairly long, dense article, but I'm planning on having it done within the typical week span—and (fingers crossed) getting a lot of the way there in the next two days. Remsense ‥  00:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind my jumping at this opportunity: I've been watching this page since it was created and have wanted to help, and I think an in-depth GAN at this stage would be perfect. Remsense ‥  18:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping me when I initially created the page. Can you explain the things in the progress box? Strongman13072007 (talk) 00:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those are each of the GA criteria, during the review I'll be updating it reflecting the state of the article as you or I make improvements. I'm a very hands-on reviewer, so I'll likely be making a lot of the improvements myself if they're clear enough, but in any case you're of course free to quibble or ask about anything I'm doing. I can be a bit of a perfectionist but I don't want that to stall the review. Remsense ‥  00:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I'm pleased to help when possible. Strongman13072007 (talk) 00:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I received a Talk notification that you all were seeking comments. Did you have specific questions? I made a few copy edits to the article, including deleting the term afterlife (under funerary). Let me know if these are useful and feel free to revert if need be. ProfGray (talk) 20:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to contribute any critique or thoughts during the process, that'd be great! Remsense ‥  22:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed