Talk:Religion in London

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

100.2%

The percentages of 58.2 + 15.8 + 8.7 + 8.5 + 4.1 + 2.1 + 1.5 + 0.8 + 0.5 = 100.2% Stratman07 (talk) 00:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed a long ago. 178.223.198.96 (talk) 05:44, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

statistical analysis

atheists and Christians are statistically brother beliefs,I said statistically, not philosophically. The Atheist and Christian map is group 1 and all others group 2. People usually don't like data and prefer philological rhetoric. Actual data are the depiction of social changes.

Also the same "problem" occurs with the Monarchy problem. Group 1 is Monarchic and Anti-monarchists and Group 2 are the indifferent. Educated statisticians who are Anti-monarchists, do support Monarchic indifference and not Anti-monarchism.

Educated people focus on data groupings. Data groupings aren't what the average analyst expects. Respecting the data and not your simpleton logic makes you more able to manipulate your opponents. Educated people use that statistical grouping analysis. Here we don't mention that weird grouping effect! It is an old known effect, the fact that statistical components we believe are opposite, mathematically are friendly to each other in a way and covariants. Of course things are deeper than that, I don't claim that a good Christian is a will be atheist, simply that most atheists are of Christian background. More data are needed over that analysis. Why to hide from Wikipedia something our politicians know and use for centuries to manipulate us? They know that the statistical behavior of a value is more important than what mainstream people believe is important. Some values are apparent covariants and not actual. The groups (Christian-Atheist) and (Monarchic- Anti-monarchist) aren't a random coincidence though, because their members act and reflect in the same manner many have the same backgrounds even if they claim - without data of course - they don't!

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Religion in London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011105208/http://www.jafi.org.il/education/100/concepts/demography/demtables.html to http://www.jafi.org.il/education/100/concepts/demography/demtables.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jedi

Article needs mention of Jedi. Census figures (2001 and 2011) show Jedi / Jedi Knight(s) between the major and minor populations of religions, which are each mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.142.197 (talk) 20:07, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]