Talk:Rekursiv

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rekursiv article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Link to irrelevant page

I am going to delete the link to [1]. because the page states: "In 1996, I found a strange set of boards in a surplus store in Lakewood, Colorado. At the time, it appeared to me that they were from a Linn Rekursiv computer, made by Linn Smart Computing of Glasgow, Scotland. I purchased them, and they wound up stored in a relative's basement until I dug them out in July 2003. It is now apparent that they are not in fact from a Rekursiv, so I'm still looking for a Rekursiv, software, or documentation." So obviously the linked page does not contain any information about Rekursiv, hence it is irrelevant for this article. It lists some references, but they can be included in this article if they are useful. Adrianwn (talk) 15:29, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the author of that web page may have been mistaken in his belief that he was in possession of a set of Rekursiv boards, but nevertheless, he has still written a web page entitled "The Linn Rekursiv Object-Oriented Computer" and compiled a list of references to said computer. Frankly, I don't understand how this list could be considered "irrelevant" to a WP article on the same subject! Letdorf (talk) 15:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The page does not contain any information about the subject, just a plain list of references. If this list was annotated, a link to it would be worth considering; however, no information about the references is given. If you think they are relevant, you are very welcome to add some or all of them to this article. Adrianwn (talk) 17:49, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

80MB in the mid eighties for an evaluation board?

While not impossible, I find that hard to believe, and didn't see the citation to support this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.193.182.33 (talk) 20:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]