This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Hi, you got my attention and I just added a bit. There is more to be mined from the Selby NRHP article. You and i need to line up some regular editors who are good with Newspapers.com stuff to ping them to ask for help like here. I am aware of there being several ones who often develop articles that are at AFD, and I always agree with them in AFD discussions. HTH --Doncram (talk) 19:19, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, in an edit summary just now I commented, and why not say more directly: for Nebraska and area articles especially, i.e. where User:Ammodramus has contributed a photo, they have usually in fact contributed a very good collection of photos. And this should be mentioned as an External link, and using {{Commons category-inline}} template, as I just put into the Selby Apartments article. Using just {{Commons category}} puts the link over at the bottom right of the article, and is much less visible. These are good collections and link should be made more prominent for readers. Elsewhere, for different photographers and amounts/quality of photos available, i might use the latter, or not provide any link if really there's not much more of value beyond the one or two pics I've included into the article already. Just sharing, that's my thinking, and including advice to use Commons category-inline originally suggested to me by Ammodramus. Cheers, --Doncram (talk) 19:29, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
