Talk:Regulation of UAVs in the United States
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Regulation of UAVs in the United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Austin Haughwout was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 20 December 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Regulation of UAVs in the United States. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 18 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Smorph0u0. Peer reviewers: Smorph0u0.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Regulation of UAVs in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140610135230/http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/uas/reg/media/frnotice_uas.pdf to http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/uas/reg/media/frnotice_uas.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Critique
[edit]Retitle
[edit]This article provides good coverage to the history of the UAV regulations in the U.S. For this reason, I believe the section "Regulation" should be more appropriately titled as "History of Regulation".
Citation and References
[edit]Although this article covers a good amount of details, many of the citations are outdated and not functioning. For example, citation 10 and 11 links to pages that are no longer found. The chronological order of the "Regulation" section seems out of place as well. As the section begins with a deadline in 2015 for establishing regulations, then goes back in time to August 2013, and continues on to a one-line-insert on the 2015 deadline again. At the same time, neither of the references mentioning the 2015 deadline is working links (citation 1 and 18). In addition, many of the examples mentioned throughout the article are uncited.
Organization
[edit]Moreover, although the article provides detail cases and examples of state-level regulation. The last three sections, particularly "Anti-UAV legislation" seems out of place. Since it consists examples of states which pose limits on the particular usage of UAVs, it seems appropriate to move it under "State-level regulation" as a sub-section. Few of the examples mentioned in "State-level regulation" could be merged with "Prosecution" which mainly focus on landmark cases. I believe that would provide a more holistic view on those cases without distracting readers from understanding the gist of the state-level regulations.