Talk:Reginald Weaver/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 22:11, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed, please check that I have the correct target.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 22:18, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot: one found and tagged.[2] Jezhotwells (talk) 22:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
I find the prose reasonably well written apart from:

...before joining two of his brothers in a stock and station agency in Forbes... "stock and station agency" needs explanation.

but instead found Weaver's own organisers guilty of roll-stuffing. "roll-stuffing" needs explanation.

I made a few minor copy-edits.[3]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
~~ref #19[4] is a dead link.~~

~~Does "Newington College Register of Past Students 1863-1998 (Syd, 1999) " have an ISBN?~~ I checked, it doesn't.

Otherwise referencing and sources OK
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Covers major details well, no unnecessary trivia.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Images have suitable captions and are correctly licensed.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, everything is fine, so i am happy to list this as a GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 14:38, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.