Talk:Regina Banali
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Regina Banali article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Someone obviously wants to hide the fact she mostly appeared in softcore movies
[edit]Just look at her imdb page. Movies called Bikini Airways, Bikini Girls form the Lost Planet, Hotel Erotica, Sex Court, Sex Files, Erotic Confessions, etc. Why does this info keep getting replaced with simply "retired actress" on this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.82.5.132 (talk) 14:19, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Policy WP:BLP applies; it's a negative opinion and need a reliable source as to the characterization of these movies. Also, the term is US-centric and outdated. And it's just not that important; and IMDB had the full list. Studerby (talk) 15:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Or rather, it's only important to people who are interested in presenting this person in a negative light. Just as Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion (self or otherwise), so to it's not a platform for disparagement. We don't publish mugshots generally, especially for folks notable for non-criminal things (see Tom Delay or Glen Campbell - we don't even list Campbell's arrest!!) and we don't publish every negative fact or opinion either. Studerby (talk) 19:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Who says it's presenting them in a negative light? Plus It's not my opinion that she was in softcore movies. SHE WAS in softcore movies. Sylvester Stallone's page mentions his early work in pornography. Plus it describes him as an actor who primarily works in action roles. Either way, if the term is "Outdated", then so be it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.82.5.132 (talk) 02:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
- Or rather, it's only important to people who are interested in presenting this person in a negative light. Just as Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion (self or otherwise), so to it's not a platform for disparagement. We don't publish mugshots generally, especially for folks notable for non-criminal things (see Tom Delay or Glen Campbell - we don't even list Campbell's arrest!!) and we don't publish every negative fact or opinion either. Studerby (talk) 19:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Low-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Women in Business articles
- Low-importance Women in Business articles
- WikiProject Women in Business articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors