Talk:Regina Banali

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Regina Banali article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Pinkmermaid (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Someone obviously wants to hide the fact she mostly appeared in softcore movies

Just look at her imdb page. Movies called Bikini Airways, Bikini Girls form the Lost Planet, Hotel Erotica, Sex Court, Sex Files, Erotic Confessions, etc. Why does this info keep getting replaced with simply "retired actress" on this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.82.5.132 (talk) 14:19, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Policy WP:BLP applies; it's a negative opinion and need a reliable source as to the characterization of these movies. Also, the term is US-centric and outdated. And it's just not that important; and IMDB had the full list. Studerby (talk) 15:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Or rather, it's only important to people who are interested in presenting this person in a negative light. Just as Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion (self or otherwise), so to it's not a platform for disparagement. We don't publish mugshots generally, especially for folks notable for non-criminal things (see Tom Delay or Glen Campbell - we don't even list Campbell's arrest!!) and we don't publish every negative fact or opinion either. Studerby (talk) 19:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Who says it's presenting them in a negative light? Plus It's not my opinion that she was in softcore movies. SHE WAS in softcore movies. Sylvester Stallone's page mentions his early work in pornography. Plus it describes him as an actor who primarily works in action roles. Either way, if the term is "Outdated", then so be it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.82.5.132 (talk) 02:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]